Gun owners may be as particular about their optics as their rifles. And if you shoot a lot, you know that not having the correct product for the circumstance might result in an unpleasant experience on the field. What if you require red-dot precision and rapid target acquisition?
Then you can choose between sig Romeo 5 or Trijicon MRO as they are the most popular red dot sights on the market.
Difference Between Trijicon MRO And Sig Romeo 5
|Model||Trijicon MRO||Sig Romeo 5|
|Dimension||L: 2.6 x W: 2.0 x H: 1.7″||L: 2.5 x W: 1.5 x H: 1.5″|
|Weight||116.2 g||144.6 g|
|Runtime||50,000 hours or more||5 Years|
|Mounting Type||Multi-Height Mounting||Multi-height mounting|
|Reticle||2 MOA Dot, 65 MOA circle||2 MOA|
|Objective Lens Diameter||25mm||20mm|
In our Trijicon MRO vs. Sig Romeo 5 comparison, we’ll look at how these two sights compare in the following criteria to determine which one offers the most value for money.
- Toughness and durability
- Reticle And Lens Clarity
- Settings For Battery Life And Brightness
- Comparison of Sizes
- Additional Optic Accessories Included
- Cost Comparison
Durability And Toughness
Trijicon MRO: The Trijicon MRO is a rugged optic. Trijicon (the firm) is well-known for producing exceptionally durable optics. In reality, the Trijicon ACOG has been used in the US military for quite some time, and the MRO is made with the same quality and attention to detail. MRO, which stands for Miniature Rifle Optic, is Trijicon’s rendition of a tiny red dot sight.
The MRO’s sight housing is forged 7075-T6 aluminum with an anodized aluminum finish to help to protect the optic from the weather.
Furthermore, the windage and elevation turrets remain recessed within the sight housing, so they can never be accidentally rotated or snapped off.
In addition, the MRO is fog-proof and waterproof in up to 100 feet (30 meters) of water. As a result, it will readily withstand rainy, snowy, or damp circumstances. With ease, it can also Withstand recoil from high-powered rifles, shotguns, and pistol caliber carbines. Overall, I’m thrilled with the Trijicon MRO’s longevity and dependability.
Sig Romeo 5: The Sig Romeo 5 is also a rugged optic. First, the sight housing is constructed of Aircraft-Grade Aluminum and has an anodized finish to help protect the optics from the environment. The windage and elevation turrets protrude somewhat on the Romeo 5, but they sit low and are well protected by the sight housing (I doubt they’ll ever be accidentally snapped off. The Romeo 5 is also fog proof and waterproof in up to 1 meter of water. As a result, it can readily withstand rainy, snowy, or damp circumstances.
It’s also shockproof, so it won’t be damaged by recoil from shotguns, high-powered rifles, or pistol-caliber carbines. I’ve seen some Romeo 5s endure a lot of damage, including being frozen into a block of ice, and still work. As a result, their durability is also rather impressive.
In my opinion, both of these sights appear to be highly sturdy and dependable. I enjoy how the windage and elevation turrets on the MRO are recessed within the sight housing. I particularly appreciate that it can be underwater in up to 100 feet of water, which means you could take SCUBA diving. It’s a difficult one. Even though I’m satisfied with the Sig Romeo 5’s longevity, the Trijicon MRO is just a tad harder. As a result, the MRO takes a narrow victory in this area.
Lens Clarity And Reticle
So, there are a few significant variances between these sites in this area.
First and foremost, while looking through the optic, the MRO has a blue tinge, whereas the Romeo 5 is relatively straightforward, which I like.
However, the MRO’s 25mm objective lens is a unique feature that provides a broader field of view than the Romeo 5’s 20mm objective lens, which is standard on other tiny red dot sights.
They both have good and bad characteristics that balance out in this area, and since they both have the same 2 MOA dot reticle, I believe it is appropriate to declare it a draw.
Battery Life and Brightness Settings
So, in this aspect, both sights offer excellent battery life, which is critical to me. I won’t even contemplate a red dot in this day and age unless it has a battery life of hundreds of hours. However, they both offer excellent brightness options and night vision settings.
The MOTAC technology incorporated on the Romeo 5 is what truly distinguishes them. When it detects motion, the light automatically switches off and on. This saves battery power while also keeping your view ready to go. As a result of the MOTAC method, the Sig Romeo 5 takes a narrow victory in this area.
Trijicon MRO: The MRO is the Trijicon’s rendition of a micro red dot sight. It barely weighs 4.1 ounces, making it relatively light.
That’s a significant aspect for me because I’m always looking for methods to reduce the weight of my guns.
Furthermore, the MRO features a 25mm objective lens. This is beneficial to your view range, but it makes the sightless compact than many competitors.
Finally, the MRO is 2.6 inches long and 2 inches tall. So, once again, it’s a relatively small red dot sight.
Sig Romeo 5: The Sig Romeo 5 is a classic micro red dot sight instead of the Trijicon MRO. It weighs 5.1 ounces, making it somewhat heavier than the MRO.
Romeo5’s objective lens is merely 20mm, which is more in line with other tiny red dot sights, and it is 1.52 inches high and 2.47 inches long.
Overall, I believe the Romeo 5 is a pretty small sight.
Additional Accessories Included With The Optic
Unless you spend extra money for a bundled factory mount, the Trijicon MRO doesn’t come with many accessories.
The Romeo 5, on the other hand, comes with a lens cover that provides additional protection for your optic.
And with a low and high mount, you may start utilizing your optic right away, regardless of the handgun you have.
So, the Sig Romeo 5 is the clear winner in this area.
Cost Comparison (Value for money)
Unfortunately, I won’t be able to provide specific figures in this area because the costs of these attractions change frequently.
Having stated that, in general, the Sig Romeo 5 prices around $300 less than the Trijicon MRO.
That’s a substantial sum of money. Thus, the Sig Romeo5 is the clear winner in this area.
Our Final Verdict
In the Durability And Toughness category, I awarded the Trijicon MRO the victory since it is somewhat more durable than the Sig Romeo 5.
I considered it a tie in the Lens Clarity And Reticle Category because both sights have certain advantages and disadvantages and use the same reticle.
The Romeo 5 took the top in the Battery Life And Brightness category because of the auto-off/auto-on (MOTAC) function.
I gave the Romeo 5 the victory in the Size Comparison since it is a somewhat more compact sight.
The Romeo 5 won again in the Extra Accessories category since it includes a low mount, a high mount, and a bikini cover.
Finally, the Romeo 5 was the clear victor in the Price Comparison, costing roughly $300 less than the MRO.
As a result, we propose Sig Romeo 5.
Hey, This is Ebert Alberts. I’m the sole writer and creator of all the content you’ll find on this site. I’ve been passionate about shooting with scopes, red dot sights, and all kinds of gun optics for years now. And during that time, I’ve learned a lot – often the hard way. I’ve wasted thousands of dollars on scopes that turned out to be duds, and I’ve also found some real gems along the way.